AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
![]() Working from a sociological perspective, I offer an interpretive analysis of the visions of guilt and innocence in Hitchcock’s films that refrains from any psychologistic dream analyses or otherwise reductive introspection. ![]() While this study is decidedly sociological in orientation, the discussion also builds from insights from the so-called auteur theory, popularized by François Truffaut’s (1984) interviews with Hitchcock, and centrally revolve around the notion of pure cinema, with which Hitchcock expressed his artistic ideal of movie making. The analysis relies on some of Hitchcock’s more popular movies, but also discussed are some of his lesser known films and some of his earlier works. In this chapter, I analyze the cinema of Alfred Hitchcock from a sociological perspective that thematically focuses on the themes of guilt and innocence. The accompanying visions of guilt and innocence in Hitchcock’s movies involve a demarcation between private guilt and public guilt, the transference of guilt across subjects, and a generalized universality of guilt. Through this ritualistic experience of transformation, which pertains both to the characters in the movies as well as their viewers, the ritual subjects are not only transformed but also subjected to, and actively experiencing, a transitional existential process that escapes from, and often even contradicts, the usual structures and demands of the social order. Situated at the intersection of the sociology of law and cultural sociology, this analysis conceives of Hitchcock’s films as manifestations of liminality that are essentially marked by a process of transition from one state to another. I explore dimensions and modalities of guilt and innocence in the movies of Alfred Hitchcock.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |